Nonprofits Unite Around Three Sisters Meadow Strategy
Community Coalition Advances Vision for Year-Round Economic Growth
The Three Sisters Meadow Partners, a coalition of local leaders and nonprofit representatives, is advancing plans to transform the 16-acre Three Sisters Meadow property into a year-round economic engine for the McKenzie River Valley.
Meeting last Thursday, the group endorsed several key steps, including exploring a shared property maintenance program, adopting new mission and vision statements, and pursuing approximately $3.5 million in potential federal infrastructure funding.
Partners discussed the maintenance needs of facilities located on, or in, the region, including the community center, water district, health clinic and riverfront walking path. Representatives said each entity could benefit from dedicated maintenance services but lack sufficient funding to hire staff independently.
As a potential solution, the group expressed support for creating a shared maintenance position that could grow into a full-time job. That approach, they felt, would allow participating organizations to reduce operational costs while ensuring consistent upkeep of facilities.
The coalition also unanimously adopted a formal mission statement: “Three Sisters Meadow will advance year-round economic vitality and resilience in the McKenzie River community.”
In shaping a broader vision, members agreed the overall project should aim to become a “nationally recognized wellness and innovation hub for outdoor recreation, community health and economic development.”
Central to that vision is reducing the valley’s seasonal economic swings by promoting four-season activity. Ideas discussed included destination lodging, conferences and community events designed to draw visitors and support local businesses throughout the year.
To help move the project forward, the group voted to submit a $3.5 million federal infrastructure appropriations application. If awarded, the funding would support critical site improvements, including septic systems and site preparation work considered necessary to accommodate future development.
Update: The final grant ask ended up being $2.5M, not $3.5M, at the recommendation of the senate staffers.
